#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison 1080p#
#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison full#
#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison free#

Because we did most of our desktop GTX 980 benchmarks at 2560x1600, I hooked the MSI GT72 up to a 30-inch monitor to test its performance against the full-size reference card, paired with a Haswell i7-3960X and 16GB DDR3. Powered benchmarks are the true test.Īt 1080p, the GTX 980M turned in great framerates plugged in, often getting above 60 frames per second. On-battery results don’t come anywhere close to the desktop 980’s performance, but that’s to be expected. Though portability is the big selling point of a gaming laptop, typically, any serious gaming time spent with them will be spent plugged into an outlet. It will take more testing to see how the MSI GT72’s battery life fares with battery boost enabled and disabled.

Disabling battery boost delivered slightly higher framerates in most games, but not enough to make a significant difference. If you can stomach gaming at 30 fps, though, Battery Boost will be able to keep games running smoothly. These are obviously strenuous tests, and turning off a few settings, even playing at high with a few bells and whistles turned off, will deliver much more playable framerates.

#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison full#

The GPU just can’t get enough juice off the battery alone to run at full capacity. Playable, but often not great-realistically, most demanding games won’t be able to maintain a solid 60 fps at these settings unplugged.

#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison 1080p#

In Tomb Raider, TressFX was enabled in Metro: Last Light, tessellation was set to high.Īs you can see, each benchmark delivered playable framerates at 1080p and ultra settings, even unplugged. Do bear in mind that the GTX 690 and Radeon HD 7990 both use a twin-GPU approach, relying on internal multi-GPU processing that can, at times, be sub-optimal when compared to a single GPU present on the TITAN.Here are the average frames per second results of each benchmark at 1080p and ultra settings, typically with 4x MSAA and an ultra preset. To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record GPU core temperature both when idle and while playing Far Cry 3Ī PCE-318 meter is used to record noise levels when idle and while playing Far Cry 3įive single cards and the two-board HD 7970 ensure this is a proper high-end test. To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record mains power draw both when idle and while playing Far Cry 3 Intel Core i7-3770K (3.50GHz, 8MB cache, quad-core)ĨGB G.Skill RipJaws (2x4GB) DDR3 1,600MHz We'd have loved to show you how these cards fare in Crysis 3, already released over the pond, but shall have to wait until tomorrow - the EMEA release date - to provide numbers. Quality levels, too, have been increased to some of the highest available in the respective games.ģDMark 11 has been replaced by the latest 3DMark (13) and, because we like the game, Sleeping Dogs has been added to the mix. We've also used a trio of BenQ full-HD monitors in a 5,760x1,080-pixel (3x1) arrangement, to really push the GPUs into handling six million pixels. We've tested this high-performance sextet on a 30in Dell monitor that has a native resolution of 2,560x1,600 pixels.

We believe so, especially as the TITAN is currently dearer than any other card/configuration in our line-up. Is it fair to compare a single-GPU card, TITAN, to dual-GPU beasts, you may ask.

#Nvidia gtx 680 comparison free#

The joker in the performance pack is the two-card Radeon HD 7970 CrossFire setup it'll set you back £600 and, at the moment, just like the HD 7990, ships with the promise of six free games. A single-card GeForce GTX 690 is the obvious performance candidate from the green team while Club3D was kind enough to provide its HD 7990 card at very short notice. TITAN's titanic pricing demands that aforementioned dual-GPU configurations are present and accounted for. We fully expect it to win most, if not all, tests. Understanding this preamble, we've tested the TITAN up against a GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition - the two fastest single-GPU cards around - on the latest drivers. GTX TITAN needs to handily outmuscle other premium single-GPU cards and give these dual-GPU goliaths a good run for their money. Yet fantastic aesthetics and cool, quiet operation only get you so far when, for most enthusiasts contemplating dropping £800-plus on a card, speed is the key criterion. NVIDIA would rather you think of it as a refined, quiet and multi-form-factor card - a well-engineered, comfortable Porsche up against AMD's fume-belching, growling Dodge Viper, if you forgive the tenuous car analogy. It is manifestly clear that value isn't the TITAN'S strong suit, and our performance predictions reckon it'll be beaten by premium dual-GPU configurations in a straight pixel-pushing footrace.